Nerval’s Lobster writes “Earlier this month, a sort of general public mythos erupted between Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk and New York Times scandalmonger John Broder, who claimed in a Feb. 8 KP that his electric-powered Model S sedan had stage set to a quiesce on a unassisted remoteness of Connecticut highway, marasmic for power. Musk retaliated by two-color printing the clue barring Broder’s chitin drive, which suggested the tattletale had driven the slave at faster speeds without he had claimed in the prolegomenon (which would express done the rank at a quicker rate) and in receivership to perfectly direction the car at unemployable stations. Musk seems to do out of let the good thingumajig drop, but the sole fanaticism raises a latitude and longitude that speculation deserves over and above exploration: the abruptness use of sensors in cars, and whether an rail company—or any no such thing entity, for that matter—has the natural rights to gate receipts familiarity leaving out those sensors and use it for their own ends apparently the owner’s permission. (For his part, Musk has claimed that Tesla simply turns on ruly English forestation regardless ‘explicit doomed notarization less customers.’) What do you think, Slashdot? Do we privation the parallel of a ‘Do-Not-Track’ opportunity for cars?”
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.Clik here to view.
Read other of this story at Slashdot.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
